On 1/18/06, Phillip Susi <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was going to say, doesn't the kernel set the FUA bit on the write
> request to push important flushes through the disk's write-back cache?
> Like for filesystem journal flushes?
Yes if:
* you have a disk supporting FUA
* you have kernel >= 2.6.16-rc1
* you are using SCSI (this includes libata) driver [ support for IDE driver
will be merged later when races in changing IDE settings are fixed ]
Bartlomiej
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > Not always. If you have a cache flush command and the OS knows about
> > using it, or if you don't care if the data gets lost over a power
> > failure (eg /tmp and swap) it makes sense to force it.
> >
> > The raid controller drivers that fake scsi don't always fake enough of
> > scsi to report that they support cache flushes and the like. That
> > doesn't mean the controller itself is neccessarily doing one thing or
> > the other.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
