Re: [WATCHDOG] sa1100_wdt.c sparse cleanups

[Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>]

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 20:04 +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> 
> > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:10 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > 
> > > It's probably better to use a union with these, eg:
> > 
> > The common idiom in the watchdog drivers seems to be to use separate
> > variables. I'll leave it up to Wim if he wants to change that.
> > 
> > The following makes drivers/char/watchdog/sa1100_wdt.c sparse clean.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <icampbell@arcom.com>
> 
> I seem to have missed this last e-mail (I was moving around that time...).
> This is indeed how it's been done in other drivers. I just uploaded this "patch"
> into my -mm test tree. Within a week or two I'll move it to the final watchdog tree.
> 
> We should look to the struct watchdog part in more detail though.
> a union is an option, but probably not the only one :-)

Hi Wim,

Thanks for applying the patch.

BTW I've changed jobs since I sent it and I'm no longer working with ARM
hardware.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell

Q:	Why do the police always travel in threes?
A:	One to do the reading, one to do the writing, and the other keeps
	an eye on the two intellectuals.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part