On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:27:16PM -0800, John Ronciak wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Another thing is that removal of the driver (or disabling the config)
> >>will hopefully force the issue in that people with these ARCHs will
> >>use the e100 and if they have problems we can get them fixed in the
> >>e100 driver. At this point nobody seems to be able to define a "real"
> >>problem other than talking about it.
>
> Someone should send me a patch that adds eepro100 to the feature-removal
> doc.
Patch below.
> jeff
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
--- linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2006-01-18 08:38:57.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 2006-01-18 08:39:59.000000000 +0100
@@ -164,0 +165,6 @@
+---------------------------
+
+What: eepro100 network driver
+When: April 2006
+Why: replaced by the e100 driver
+Who: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]