Re: PATCH: SBC EPX does not check/claim I/O ports it uses

Hi,

> @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@
>  static int __init watchdog_init(void)
>  {
>         int ret;
> +
> +       if (!request_region(EPXC3_WATCHDOG_CTL_REG, 2, "epxc3_watchdog"))
> +               return -EBUSY;
>
>         ret = register_reboot_notifier(&epx_c3_notifier);
>         if (ret) {

Shouldn't resource be released when
register_reboot_notifier() or misc_register() fails?

Bartlomiej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- PATCH: SBC EPX does not check/claim I/O ports it uses (2nd Edition)
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: PATCH: SBC EPX does not check/claim I/O ports it uses
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

References:
- PATCH: SBC EPX does not check/claim I/O ports it uses
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] zonelists gfp_zone() is really gfp_zonelist()
Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1
Previous by thread: PATCH: SBC EPX does not check/claim I/O ports it uses
Next by thread: Re: PATCH: SBC EPX does not check/claim I/O ports it uses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]