On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 at 10:27 +0000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Is there any good reason for not making "struct dcookie_struct
> *d_cookie" dependable on CONFIG_PROFILING?
>
> Shrinks "struct dentry" from 128 bytes to 124 on x86, allowing
> 31 objects per slab instead of 30.
>
> John Levon informed me that he had such selection in his
> original patches, but was asked but take it off (?).
iirc this was seen usefull by other tools than profiler but
fs/Makefile contains:
obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILING) += dcookies.o
and nobody complained agaisnt it.
--
regards,
Philippe Elie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
