Re: Race in new page migration code?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:51:26PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> I agree with Christoph that the zero page should be ignored - old behaviour
> was really a bug.
> 

Fair enough. It would be nice to have a comment there has Hugh said;
it is not always clear what PageReserved is intended to test for.

Nick

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Race in new page migration code?
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Race in new page migration code?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: Race in new page migration code?
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: Race in new page migration code?
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • Re: Race in new page migration code?
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] RCU tuning for latency/OOM
• Next by Date: PATCH: Remove riotime.h from rio driver (unused file)
• Previous by thread: Re: Race in new page migration code?
• Next by thread: Re: Race in new page migration code?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]