On 16/01/2006 4:22 p.m., Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 13/01/2006 4:53 a.m., Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
irq 193: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
handlers:
[<c027017e>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x56)
Disabling IRQ #193
USB lost its interrupt. Could be USB, more likely ACPI.
I've seen this one happen nearly every boot since then including bootups that
are otherwise OK (no oopses), so it's probably worth more looking into rather
than being written off as a 'once off':
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.3: Unlink after no-IRQ? Controller is probably using the
wrong IRQ.
Note the PCI ID is 1d.3 and the IRQ is 193.
Hi Alan,
If it's any use, here's some simply and easy-to-get information which may even
be what you are looking for:
[root@tornado dovecot]# uname -a
Linux tornado.reub.net 2.6.15-mm1 #1 SMP Sun Jan 8 03:42:25 NZDT 2006 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
[root@tornado ~]# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
0: 21638510 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
4: 356 0 IO-APIC-edge serial
8: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
14: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0
50: 3 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2
169: 120 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb5
177: 2837992 0 IO-APIC-level sky2
185: 61450 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb4, serial
193: 4722447 0 IO-APIC-level libata, uhci_hcd:usb3
Note that in the earlier kernel, IRQ 193 is assigned to usb3. That's the
second UHCI controller, since usb1 is EHCI.
[root@tornado ~]# lspci
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family)
USB UHCI #1 (rev 03)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family)
USB UHCI #2 (rev 03)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family)
USB UHCI #3 (rev 03)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family)
USB UHCI #4 (rev 03)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family)
USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 03)
Note that 1d.3 is the fourth UHCI controller; the second is 1d.1.
I guess this looks like it was assigned the same IRQ ?
I don't think so. To be certain you'd have to check the boot-up log and
verify that 1d.1 is usb3 and 1d.3 is usb5.
From the information presented here, it looks like -mm1 correctly routes
the 1d.1 controller to IRQ 193 and the 1d.3 controller to IRQ 169, whereas
-mm3 incorrectly routes the 1d.3 controller to IRQ 193. That would make
it an ACPI problem.
Is this likely to be the same or similar issue to the IRQ 0 problem I see quite
frequently on the SATA ports on later -mm releases?
(see http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0601.1/1851.html)
Reuben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]