Re: [patch] mm: cleanup bootmem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> Oh the BITS_PER_LONG batching?

Yes.

>			 That's still completely functional after
> my patch. In fact, as I said in a followup it is likely to work better
> than with David's change to free batched pages as order-0, because I
> reverted back to freeing them as higher order pages.

Ok. Then I doubt anybody will complain. I'm still wondering if some of the 
other ugliness was due to some simulator strangeness issues, but maybe 
even ia64 doesn't care that much any more..

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux