On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 20:10 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Thanks, I'll add that to my list of tests too. > > Oh and 2.6.15 passed as well (with clock=pmtmr) It really seems like it would fail if you gave it enough time due to the rdtsc in monotonic_clock()... Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- References:
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: "Roger Heflin" <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Prev by Date: Fall back io scheduler for 2.6.15?
- Next by Date: Re: wireless: recap of current issues (configuration)
- Previous by thread: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Next by thread: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Index(es):
 |