Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> +static int futex_deadlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> +{
> +	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> +	_raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +	_raw_spin_unlock(&current->pi_lock);

And why is there a pi_lock if the code isn't supposed to support PI?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm2: alpha broken
Next by Date: wireless: recap of current issues (compatibility)
Previous by thread: Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
Next by thread: Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]