Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> +static int futex_deadlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> +{
> +	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> +	_raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +	_raw_spin_unlock(&current->pi_lock);

And why is there a pi_lock if the code isn't supposed to support PI?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm2: alpha broken
• Next by Date: wireless: recap of current issues (compatibility)
• Previous by thread: Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
• Next by thread: Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]