On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:26 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:09 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Nope it doesn't work :-( > > > > I ran this test: > > http://www.kihontech.com/tests/rt/monotonic.c > > > [...] > > > > I'll reboot to vanilla 2.6.15 and see if that is broken too (just to > > make sure) > > > > Failed on 2.6.15 too: > Ugh. In arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c monotonic_clock() uses the TSC unconditionally. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- References:
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: "Roger Heflin" <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Prev by Date: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- Next by Date: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Previous by thread: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Next by thread: RE: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
- Index(es):
 |