Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:04:41AM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

> This is true for 64-bit writes over Hypertransport

is this something that will always be or just something current
hardware does?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
  - From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
  - From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
  - From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
  - From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 09/13] USBATM: measure buffer size in bytes; force valid sizes
Next by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/01] Move Exit Connectors
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]