Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > but x86 doesn't compile kernel/compat.c But it usually compiles singal.c ;) Hang on a mo.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- Prev by Date: Re: RT Mutex patch and tester [PREEMPT_RT]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 15/17] [PATCH] moxa serial: add proper capability check
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [5/6] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386
- Index(es):
 |