2.6.15-mm3 - disk quotas apparently busticated..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Disk quotas have been functioning for me for quite a while (including 2.6.15 and
2.6.15-rc*-mm* - haven't tried 15-mm1 or 15-mm2 yet).

Under the 2.6.15-mm3 kernel, 'quotaon /home' (or any other ext3 filesystem
that had functional quotas on it fails:

# quotaon /home
quotaon: using /home/aquota.group on /dev/mapper/rootvg-home [/home]: Invalid argument
quotaon: Maybe create new quota files with quotacheck(8)?
quotaon: using /home/aquota.user on /dev/mapper/rootvg-home [/home]: Invalid argument
quotaon: Maybe create new quota files with quotacheck(8)?
# quotacheck -u -g -m /home
# quotaon /home
quotaon: using /home/aquota.group on /dev/mapper/rootvg-home [/home]: Invalid argument
quotaon: Maybe create new quota files with quotacheck(8)?
quotaon: using /home/aquota.user on /dev/mapper/rootvg-home [/home]: Invalid argument
quotaon: Maybe create new quota files with quotacheck(8)?

Using quota-3.13.

Poking with strace finds:
...
quotactl(Q_QUOTAON|GRPQUOTA, "/dev/mapper/rootvg-home", 2, {8169863311701010479, 8030594534456192885, 141733949557, 8097873655606109231, 8390047167027504496, 28549297904379766, 1309965025280, 13254570172929388888}) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
...
quotactl(Q_QUOTAON|USRQUOTA, "/dev/mapper/rootvg-home", 2, {8169863311701010479, 7310315462216413045, 141733920882, 8097873655606109231, 8390047167027504496, 28549297904379766, 210453397504, 7018986666877744431}) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)

And the following corresponding cryptic messages in dmesg:

[ 1833.288000] failed read
[ 1833.332000] failed read

(which is why I just submitted a patch to fs/quota_v2.c)

Further digging based on the info from that patch implicates ext3_quota_read()
(which itself seems potentially buggy - it has code that says:

                bh = ext3_bread(NULL, inode, blk, 0, &err);
                if (err)
                        return err;

which is returning 1 in my case.  Good thing that ext3_get_blocks_handle()
(which eventually gets called) can't return 8....

It's getting down to fs/ext3/inode.c ext3_getblk() and this code:

        *errp = ext3_get_blocks_handle(handle, inode, block, 1, &dummy, create, 1);
        if ((*errp == 1 ) && buffer_mapped(&dummy)) {

which sets *errp to 1. We then enter a 40-line block, which can return a valid
struct buffer_head, but never set another value into *errp.

Bug/question: Should that big 'if' statement reset *errp if things work out OK?

--- inode.c     2006-01-12 13:35:44.000000000 -0500
+++ inode.c.temp        2006-01-12 16:13:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -1048,14 +1048,16 @@
                } else {
                        BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "not a new buffer");
                }
                if (fatal) {
                        *errp = fatal;
                        brelse(bh);
                        bh = NULL;
+               } else {
+                       *errp = 0;
                }
                return bh;
        }
 err:
        return NULL;
 }

Attachment: pgpbnJD8Yke0n.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux