On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:57:50AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Here's a list of the remaining things we current expose in /proc/xen
> that have no obvious place:
>
> 1) capabilities (is the domain a management domain)
Is this just a single value or a bitfield?
> 2) xsd_mfn (a frame number for our bus so that userspace can connect to it)
Single number, right?
> 3) xsd_evtchn (a virtual IRQ for xen bus for userspace)
Again, single number?
> I would think these would most obviously go under something like:
>
> /sys/hypervisor/xen/
>
> That would introduce a hypervisor subsystem. There are at least a few
> hypervisors out there already so this isn't that bad of an idea
> (although perhaps it may belong somewhere else in the hierarchy). Greg?
I would have no problem with /sys/hypervisor/xen/ as long as you play by
the rest of the rules for sysfs (one value per file, no binary blobs
being intrepreted by the kernel, etc.)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
