Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: need for packed attribute

Russell King wrote:
> BTW, it's worth noting that the new EABI stuff has it's own set of
> problems.  We have r0 to r6 to pass 32-bit or 64-bit arguments.
> With EABI, 64-bit arguments will be aligned to an _even_ numbered
> register.

Is there a reason for this alignment requirement?

David Vrabel
-- 
David Vrabel, Design Engineer

Arcom, Clifton Road           Tel: +44 (0)1223 411200 ext. 3233
Cambridge CB1 7EA, UK         Web: http://www.arcom.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: need for packed attribute
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: need for packed attribute
    • From: Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]>
  • Re: need for packed attribute
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: need for packed attribute
    • From: Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]>
  • Re: need for packed attribute
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
• Next by Date: WCONF, netlink based WE replacement.
• Previous by thread: Re: need for packed attribute
• Next by thread: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: need for packed attribute
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]