Re: [PATCH] sem2mutex bdev->bd_sem

On Thu, Jan 12 2006, Kedar Sovani wrote:
> Strange. It did compile in here w/o a problem.

How could it, when you don't even add bd_mutex to the block_device
structure?

I'd rather just let the patches flow from Ingo's automated setup.
Lessens the chance of problems.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] sem2mutex bdev->bd_sem
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Back to the Future ? or some thing sinister ?
• Next by Date: Re: Place for userland swsusp parts
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sem2mutex bdev->bd_sem
• Next by thread: [PATCH] sem2mutex block_device : bd_sem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]