Hi,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Ben Collins wrote:
> > silentoldconfig gives you exactly the same information. Both conf and
> > oldconfig will change invisible options without telling you, so it's not
> > exact at all.
> > If you can't trust a silent oldconfig, a more verbose oldconfig can't tell
> > you anything else, if it would it's a bug.
>
> silentoldconfig tells you a lot less, agreed?
No.
> Hijack? It was broken, correct? It has always been broken. This problem
> has existed for as long as I've been handling kernel builds with Debian
> (which seems to be about 6-7 years now). So intended behavior aside, it
> has never worked as intended.
And it took you 6 years to report this problem?
> > > 5) My patch did not break anything, nor did it change anything that was
> > > already working.
> >
> > It _was_ working like that, you're breaking it.
>
> At what point did oldconfig use default values when stdin was closed?
It broke with this patch:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git;a=commit;h=4b518e42f97b96abd84f5106e43711dbff3c5707
> > So simply use silentoldconfig.
>
> That's not the usage I want.
You only want some specific output, which has zero advantage over the
silentoldconfig output.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]