Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] __raw_memcpy_toio32 for x86_64

    Andi> Well then they can just as well use normal memcpy as long as
    Andi> they don't pass any sizes % 4 != 0. That should be ok as
    Andi> long as they add a comment there.

But then the driver will be doing memcpy() to I/O memory, which may
work by chance on x86_64 but will blow up on other archs.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] __raw_memcpy_toio32 for x86_64
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2 of 2] __raw_memcpy_toio32 for x86_64
    • From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] __raw_memcpy_toio32 for x86_64
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] __raw_memcpy_toio32 for x86_64
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] __raw_memcpy_toio32 for x86_64
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] sysfs support for Xen attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] __raw_memcpy_toio32 for x86_64
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] __raw_memcpy_toio32 for x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]