Re: + add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch added to -mm tree

On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 17:21 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> umm, not all editors do that.  Some wrap the text, and it looks like
> crap.

So we go for equal opportunities by making it look like crap for
everyone?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: + add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: + add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: clone() + glibc thread safe?
Next by Date: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
Previous by thread: Re: + add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch added to -mm tree
Next by thread: clone() + glibc thread safe?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]