Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix

Paul Fulghum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Fix typos in new tty buffering that incorrectly
>  access and update buffers in pending queue.

Curious.  How did this manage to sneak through without anyone noticing? 
Does tty_buffer_request_room() mostly work, or do only rarely-used drivers
use it, or what?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
    • From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
    • From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC?] usb/input: Add support for fn key on Apple PowerBooks
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ia64: change defconfig to NR_CPUS==1024
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]