Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix

Paul Fulghum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Fix typos in new tty buffering that incorrectly
>  access and update buffers in pending queue.

Curious.  How did this manage to sneak through without anyone noticing? 
Does tty_buffer_request_room() mostly work, or do only rarely-used drivers
use it, or what?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
  - From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
  - From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC?] usb/input: Add support for fn key on Apple PowerBooks
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ia64: change defconfig to NR_CPUS==1024
Previous by thread: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering access fix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]