Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64

On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 15:45 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:

> Sorry to keep this going still further, but I'm still confused.  Why
> can't this assembly just define __raw_memcpy_toio32() directly?

It certainly can.  I've just been buried in this bloody thing for a
little too long.

	<b

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
    • From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] arch/sparc64/Kconfig: fix HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64K dependencies
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm3: arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn_proc_fs.c compile error
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]