Daniel Drake wrote:
FWIW, my opinion is that the devicescape code should be broken down and
used to extend the existing stack, no matter how 'good' it is. The way
it has been developed (i.e. totally outside of the ieee80211 stack) is
somewhat insulting to our development process.
Strongly agreed, though perhaps some of the blame rests on me for
letting ieee80211 sit around too long without a clear maintainer...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
