>the conversion is buggy.
>
>mutex_trylock has the same convention as spin_try_lock (which is the
>opposite of down_trylock). THe conversion forgot to add a !
>
> static void ext3_write_super (struct super_block * sb)
> {
>- if (mutex_trylock(&sb->s_lock) != 0)
>+ if (!mutex_trylock(&sb->s_lock) != 0)
How about a nicer...?
if(mutex_trylock(&sb->s_lock) == 0)
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
