Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> And ^?

^ is fine.

And just to be complete: I sent DaveM the correct line for that file in
question, I just C&Ped the wrong line my scripts produced.  The mail
seem not to make it to lkml.  In fact, none of my mail originated from
the gmail account ever made it.  I don't know what filter doesn't like me.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
    • From: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>
  • Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Kernel Education
• Next by Date: Re: Is user-space AIO dead?
• Previous by thread: Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
• Next by thread: Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]