Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> And ^?

^ is fine.

And just to be complete: I sent DaveM the correct line for that file in
question, I just C&Ped the wrong line my scripts produced.  The mail
seem not to make it to lkml.  In fact, none of my mail originated from
the gmail account ever made it.  I don't know what filter doesn't like me.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
  - From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>

References:
- Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
  - From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
- Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
- Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
  - From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
- Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
  - From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
- Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel Education
Next by Date: Re: Is user-space AIO dead?
Previous by thread: Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
Next by thread: Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]