On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Kenny Simpson wrote:
Hi,
Having read the excellent paper by IBM presented at the 2003 OLS about Asynchronous I/O Support
in Linux 2.5, I found the conclusion rather disappointing:
"In conclusion, there appears to be no conditions for raw or O_DIRECT access under which AIO can
show a noticable benefit." - p385.
http://archive.linuxsymposium.org/ols2003/Proceedings/All-Reprints/Reprint-Pulavarty-OLS2003.pdf
Is this still the case?
If I want a transactional engine (like a database) that needs to persist to stable storage, is it
still best to use a helper thread to do write/fsync or O_SYNC|O_DIRECT?
Wouldn't nonblocking I/O on regular files be nice?
- D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
