On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 14:34 +0100, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> Hi Arjan!
>
> On 11 Jan 2006, at 13:51, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > you just cannot depend on which would run first, child or parent. Even
> > if linux would do it the other way around, you have no guarantee.
> > Think
> > SMP or Dual Core processors and time slices and cache misses... your
> > code just HAS to be able to cope with it. Even on solaris ;)
>
> That means that the starting of the child process needs to be
> synchronized by the application itself. I tried it once but then I
> discovered that my case was easily solved in a completely different
> way (it was a very small project). However, which one is the easiest/
> fastest way to do this synchronization? Using SysV-Semaphores? Pipes?
> Would something like this work?
How about POSIX process-shared mutexes? There's no documentation
avalable on using them with Linux (where are the NPTL man pages
already?) but they work.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
