Re: [patch 4/5] Add MMC password protection (lock/unlock) support V3

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:32:17AM -0400, Anderson Briglia wrote:
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Anderson Briglia wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>@@ -238,6 +295,11 @@ int mmc_register_card(struct mmc_card *c
> >>			if (ret)
> >>				device_del(&card->dev);
> >>		}
> >>+#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_PASSWORDS
> >>+		ret = device_create_file(&card->dev, &mmc_dev_attr_lockable);
> >>+		if (ret)
> >>+			device_del(&card->dev);
> >>+#endif
> >>	}
> >>	return ret;
> >>}
> >> 
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > It might be wise to also check the command classes here. I don't believe
> > SDIO supports locking.
> 
> In this case, the lockable attribute will show "unlockable", which is
> the expected behavior. The lockable attribute will always be present,
> the card being lockable or not.

"unlockable" seems to be confusing.

"Unlockable" may mean something which is locked but can be unlocked
(unlock-able).  Or it may mean something which can't be locked
(un-lockable).

Maybe returning "unsupported", "locked", "unlocked" etc would be
clearer?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/