Re: 2.4: e100 accounting bust for multiple adapters

On 1/9/06, Grant Coady <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> While testing for a different issue on a box with two e100 NICs I noticed
> that interrupt and other accounting are accumulated to the first e100 NIC.

are the two e100's on the same broadcast domain?  if they are you
might actually be transferring all traffic on eth0

e100 doesn't track its own interrupt counts, the kernel does that for us.

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.4: e100 accounting bust for multiple adapters
    • From: Grant Coady <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.4: e100 accounting bust for multiple adapters
    • From: Grant Coady <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] [BUG]kallsyms_lookup_name should return the text addres
• Next by Date: Re: 2G memory split
• Previous by thread: 2.4: e100 accounting bust for multiple adapters
• Next by thread: Re: 2.4: e100 accounting bust for multiple adapters
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]