On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:01:41AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> I agree, I'm really just trying to shepard this home so we don't have
> to maintain it out of tree. I'm not overly attached to the code, if
> I can make parisc64 work with your compat signal bits, I'll be
> just as happy.
>
> The one thing from this patchset I'd like to keep is the is_compat_task()
> as it does provide nice cleanups
Yes, the is_compat_task helper is a nice thing to have. I haven't
needed it for the signal bits I've done yet, but it's also useful
elsewhere. But IIRC someone vehemently opposed it in the last round
of discussion.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
