At 01:56 PM 1/10/2006 +0100, Paolo Ornati wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:07:33 +0100 Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you please try this version? It tries harder to correct any It seems that you have forgotten the to attach the patch...
Drat. At least I'm not the first to ever do so :) (double checks) It's now attached. -Mike
Attachment:
sched_throttle2
Description: Binary data
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- References:
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>
- Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] scsi/pcmcia/fdomain_stub.c: Handle scsi_add_host failure
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2 - 2.6.15]net:32 bit (socket layer) ioctl emulation for 64 bit kernels
- Previous by thread: Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- Next by thread: Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
- Index(es):