Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case

At 01:56 PM 1/10/2006 +0100, Paolo Ornati wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:07:33 +0100
Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can you please try this version?  It tries harder to correct any

It seems that you have forgotten the to attach the patch...

Drat.  At least I'm not the first to ever do so :)

(double checks)  It's now attached.

        -Mike   

Attachment: sched_throttle2
Description: Binary data

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
    • From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
    • From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
    • From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
    • From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] scsi/pcmcia/fdomain_stub.c: Handle scsi_add_host failure
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2 - 2.6.15]net:32 bit (socket layer) ioctl emulation for 64 bit kernels
• Previous by thread: Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
• Next by thread: Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]