Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time

Hi, Andrew, 
On 10 January 2006 10:13, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> A quick grep indicates that you reported zero bugs to this mailing list in
> 2005.
> 
> Please preapre quality bug reports (preferably in less-than-80-column
> emails) and direct them to the relevant maintainers and be prepared to work
> with those maintainers in the resolution of the bugs.
Bug #1188 . See for yourself about quality of reported data, relevant maintainers and my prepareness to work with them to resolve.
(P.S. Two fscking years.)

-- 
Managing your Territory since the dawn of times ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>

References:
- Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Boxer Gnome <[email protected]>
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Yaroslav Rastrigin <[email protected]>
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: intelfb
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __raw_memcpy_toio32
Previous by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Next by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]