Hi. >>Same as when Renault introduced the keyless system in the Laguna in 2001 >>(some call it the Laguna II) - it's basically a card you stick into a >>slot in the console which enables you to just press a button to start >>the car instead of turning a key and it also contained memory about >>your chair settings, mirrors and volume/sound settings of the radio. >> >>Now, is this a highly complex piece of software running there to do >>those things? >> >>Regardless of how what someone believes - a few months later someone >>was out driving and all of a sudden the car started speeding up and >>since there was no key you couldn't turn the car off and the breaks >>weren't strong enough to slow the car down and running at roughly >>200kph he managed to YANK the card out of the slot before it could be >>slowed down and the ignition turned off - the guy was lucky to be >>alive. > > > I think you are mixing 2 stories. According to my sources, the driver > of a Renault Vel Satis reported a similar issue and got stuck at > around 190kmph during an hour in October 2004. In March 2005, the > driver of a Laguna reported that he got stuck at 90 kmph for 40km. Hm. >>It turns out that it was a combination of a bug in the keyless >>system AND the cruise control that made this happen - two bugs >>that in themselves wouldn't have triggered but at the right speed, >>and when everything matched things went haywire, so no, no matter >>how tight you write specifications or papers you can't get >>everything bugfree, even in such a simple system as a keycard >>for your car. Note that one of the bugs WAS in the keycard. > > > To my knowledge, none of the reported issues have yet been identified > as coming from the car. I searched again before posting and found no > reference to that issue. > > I would be happy to know where you found this information. At least to > know if the constructors are hidding something. Timeframe of the Laguna incident is roughly correct to my memory. It was reported in the Swedish newspapers. I'll try searching for it and see what I come up with, even though it's totally OT. // Stefan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Jaroslav Kysela <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Hannu Savolainen <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Marcin Dalecki <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Zan Lynx <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: Stefan Smietanowski <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- From: jerome lacoste <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] PCI patches for 2.6.15 - retry
- Next by Date: Re: [stable] Re: 2.6.14.x and weird things with interrupts on smp machines
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity
- Index(es):