Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time

On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:54 +0800, Boxer Gnome wrote:
> and the dos ntfs driver was not released by the MS offical.So,what' wrong?
> 
> Somebody who can explain this ?

The NTFS vendor is identical to the DOS vendor. Therefore it has access
to current, correct and complete documentation and can control and test
changes on dedicated test systems before bugs hits users seriously.
In case of filesystems (like here), "hitting the user seriously" means
"loosing the whole filesystem. Go and look for a recent backup.".

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
    • From: Boxer Gnome <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
• Next by Date: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
• Previous by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
• Next by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]