Re: [PATCH 4/8] RTC subsystem, proc interface

[Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:56:29 -0500
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net> wrote:

> > +static void rtc_proc_remove_device(struct class_device *class_dev,
> > +                                             struct class_interface *class_intf)
> > +{
> > +       down(&rtc_sem);
> > +       if (rtc_dev == class_dev) {
> > +               remove_proc_entry("driver/rtc", NULL);
> > +               rtc_dev = NULL;
> > +       }
> > +       up(&rtc_sem);
> > +}
> 
> What if I happen to remove (unregister) rtc devices in order other
> than they were registered in? You need a counter there instead of
> storing the first device created.

 Only the first device that registers will get the /proc/driver/rtc
 entry, which will be removed when the driver unregisters.

 /proc/driver/rtc is a legacy interface, thus supporting it
 for more than one RTC is useless. Any system that uses
 more than one RTCs should access them via /dev/rtcX or
 via sysfs.


-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/