Re: MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs)

Hi everyone,

I have two ideas about what to do with MODULE_VERSION:
1.- Defining MODULE_VERSION = KERNEL_VERSION
2.- Schedule it for removal in one or two more versions, and automagically use 
the KERNEL_VERSION as module's version.

Any comments?

-- 
Carlos Manuel Duclos Vergara
http://www.toolchains.com/personal/blog
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs)
    • From: Håkon Løvdal <[email protected]>
  • Re: MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs)
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• References:
  • MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs)
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rt2 - repeatable xrun - no good data in trace
• Next by Date: Re: MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs)
• Previous by thread: MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs)
• Next by thread: Re: MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]