Re: [PATCH 1/4] move capable() to capability.h

[Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 21:51:06 PST, "Randy.Dunlap" said:
> 
> > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > 
> > headers + core:
> > - Move capable() from sched.h to capability.h;
> > - Use <linux/capability.h> where capable() is used
> > 	(in include/, block/, ipc/, kernel/, a few drivers/,
> > 	mm/, security/, & sound/;
> > 	many more drivers/ to go)
> 
> Are there plans for a second patch series to remove sched.h from those
> files that only needed it for capable()?

Yes. I've written a set of (horrendously inefficient, but working) scripts 
that detect whenever sched.h isn't needed in a file anymore.
So I think it's ok if Randy just leaves the dangling references to 
sched.h, I will clean them up afterwards.

I recently stopped posting patches because I will be offline for a month 
or two and thus unable to look after problems that these patches might 
cause. I hope to resume operation in March.

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/