On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:41:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It seems the "make UID16 support optional" patch was checked when it
> edited the -tiny tree some time ago, but it wasn't checked whether it
> still matches the current situation when it was submitted for inclusion
> in -mm. This patch fixes the following bugs:
> - ARCH_S390X does no longer exist, nowadays this has to be expressed
> through (S390 && 64BIT)
> - in five architecture specific Kconfig files the UID16 options
> weren't removed
>
> Additionally, it changes the fragile negative dependencies of UID16 to
> positive dependencies (new architectures are more likely to not
> require UID16 support).
Yeah, that's a better approach. Thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
