Russell King wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:17:48AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > >>@@ -1079,9 +1030,9 @@ static int wbsd_get_ro(struct mmc_host* >> } >> >> static struct mmc_host_ops wbsd_ops = { >>- .request = wbsd_request, >>- .set_ios = wbsd_set_ios, >>- .get_ro = wbsd_get_ro, >>+ .request = wbsd_request, >>+ .set_ios = wbsd_set_ios, >>+ .get_ro = wbsd_get_ro, > > > In addition to Alexey's comments, I think this was better before being > "reindented". If you agree, could you produce a new patch please? > I do. I changed what I noticed, but evidently I missed some things. I'll go over it again and send you a new patch later today. Rgds Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- References:
- [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm2
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- Index(es):