Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:17:48AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
>>@@ -1079,9 +1030,9 @@ static int wbsd_get_ro(struct mmc_host*
>> }
>>
>> static struct mmc_host_ops wbsd_ops = {
>>- .request = wbsd_request,
>>- .set_ios = wbsd_set_ios,
>>- .get_ro = wbsd_get_ro,
>>+ .request = wbsd_request,
>>+ .set_ios = wbsd_set_ios,
>>+ .get_ro = wbsd_get_ro,
>
>
> In addition to Alexey's comments, I think this was better before being
> "reindented". If you agree, could you produce a new patch please?
>
I do. I changed what I noticed, but evidently I missed some things. I'll
go over it again and send you a new patch later today.
Rgds
Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- References:
- [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm2
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
- Index(es):
 |