Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Could you please see if this looks better than the previous one?
>

I think so.  I guess we should wrap the swapfile.c functions in
CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH -mm 0/2] swsusp: low level interface
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] [MMC] Lindent wbsd driver
Next by Date: Re: [KERNEL 2.6.15] All files have -rw-rw-rw- permission.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]