Re: [2.6 patch] scsi_transport_spi.c: make print_nego() static

El Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:39:18 +0100,
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> escribió:

> This patch makes a needlessly global function static.


Ok, so this is probably a stupid question and it may have been already
discussed but.....

Isn't possible that GCC would/will add an extension (a useful one) similar
to the visibility thing that c++ got in GCC 4.x? It somewhat weird
that we need to mark things static, instead of the contrary (marking
as global the things you want to make global, would be much nicer since
the functions made global would be the "API")
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] scsi_transport_spi.c: make print_nego() static
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-mm1 - locks solid when starting KDE (EDAC errors)
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] scsi_transport_spi.c: make print_nego() static
• Next by thread: [2.6 patch] scsi_transport_spi.c: make print_nego() static
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]