Re: [2.6 patch] fix arm26 THREAD_SIZE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adrian Bunk wrote:

Looks good to me. cant recall why that got that way, but the div by zero definately went away at the time. certainly its wrong as-is, the implication is that an 8 MB machine would get a max_threads of about 4 :)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>

--- linux-2.6.15-mm1-full/include/asm-arm26/thread_info.h.old 2006-01-06 16:45:40.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.15-mm1-full/include/asm-arm26/thread_info.h 2006-01-06 16:46:07.000000000 +0100
@@ -80,8 +80,7 @@
 	return (struct thread_info *)(sp & ~0x1fff);
 }

-/* FIXME - PAGE_SIZE < 32K */
-#define THREAD_SIZE (8*32768) // FIXME - this needs attention (see kernel/fork.c which gets a nice div by zero if this is lower than 8*32768
+#define THREAD_SIZE	PAGE_SIZE
#define task_pt_regs(task) ((struct pt_regs *)(task_stack_page(task) + THREAD_SIZE - 8) - 1)
 extern struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info(struct task_struct *task);



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux