Re: dual line backtraces for i386.

Bob Copeland wrote:
> Sure: if you use '\t' then you can do:
> 
> printk("%c", 9+space++);
> space &= 1;

Please...

	char space = '\t';
	[...]
	printk("%c", space);
	space = ('\t' + '\n') - space;

Even fewer instructions and actually somewhat understandable.

-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: dual line backtraces for i386.
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: dual line backtraces for i386.
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: dual line backtraces for i386.
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: dual line backtraces for i386.
    • From: Bob Copeland <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Better diagnostics for broken configs
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2/7] enable unit-at-a-time optimisations for gcc4
• Previous by thread: Re: dual line backtraces for i386.
• Next by thread: Re: dual line backtraces for i386.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]