On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 13:58 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Another CPU might be stuck in a long > running interrupt Shouldn't a long running interrupt be considered a bug? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] sysctl: dont overflow the user-supplied buffer with 0
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] sysctl: dont overflow the user-supplied buffer with 0
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
- Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/tulip/xircom_tulip_cb.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
- Index(es):
 |