Re: [PATCH] pktgen: Adds missing __init.

[Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>]

>diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c
>index 06cad2d..5eeae0d 100644
>--- a/net/core/pktgen.c
>+++ b/net/core/pktgen.c
>@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ static int pktgen_add_device(struct pktg
> 	return add_dev_to_thread(t, pkt_dev);
> }
> 
>-static struct pktgen_thread *pktgen_find_thread(const char* name) 
>+static struct pktgen_thread __init *pktgen_find_thread(const char* name) 

I do not know what CodingStyle says about it (it is correct GCC code),
what do the others think of the more often placement of __init as in
  __init static struct pktgen_thread *pktgen_find_thread(const char *name)
or
  static __init struct pktgen_thread *pktgen_find_thread(const char *name)
[depending on what people like]



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/