Christoph Hellwig wrote:
If you could hold off just a couple of weeks, I hope that we can get
through our EMC process junk and get the GPL'ed patch out to fix the
symmetrix support part of this rolled in as well,
Why? We never do things to support legally questionable binary modules.
And on the practical side, does emc even ship modules for -mm release?
What's the point of not putting it into -mm?
No need for an EMC module, I think that we can issue a simple patch to
dasd.c that removes the (silly) binary module that was there.
I would prefer that the clean up not break one of the few (and
relatively common) devices supported by the dasd.c driver. If for no
other reason, it would seem to make it more likely to be able test the
existing patch properly.
ric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
