swsusp vs. modular IDE (or wherever your swap is)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Do I understand correctly that swsusp requires drivers for primary swap to be 
compiled in kernel? It appears that initrd-based implementation is possible 
(load drivers for resume partition and then attempt to do manual resume via 
"echo x:y > /sys/power/resume") - are there any issues associated with it?

TIA

- -andrey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDvnu/R6LMutpd94wRAveZAKC9Vz5a7My6zphTjCeXcelrTcQQOwCfWM1Q
8v/z+GMDfYuSj6sgZGghCKI=
=8+Hb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: swsusp vs. modular IDE (or wherever your swap is)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ptrace denies access to EFLAGS_RF
• Next by Date: [PATCH RT] make hrtimer_nanosleep return immediately if time has passed
• Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386
• Next by thread: Re: swsusp vs. modular IDE (or wherever your swap is)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]