swsusp vs. modular IDE (or wherever your swap is)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Do I understand correctly that swsusp requires drivers for primary swap to be 
compiled in kernel? It appears that initrd-based implementation is possible 
(load drivers for resume partition and then attempt to do manual resume via 
"echo x:y > /sys/power/resume") - are there any issues associated with it?

TIA

- -andrey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDvnu/R6LMutpd94wRAveZAKC9Vz5a7My6zphTjCeXcelrTcQQOwCfWM1Q
8v/z+GMDfYuSj6sgZGghCKI=
=8+Hb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: swsusp vs. modular IDE (or wherever your swap is)
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: ptrace denies access to EFLAGS_RF
Next by Date: [PATCH RT] make hrtimer_nanosleep return immediately if time has passed
Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386
Next by thread: Re: swsusp vs. modular IDE (or wherever your swap is)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]