Re: [PATCH] Shrinks sizeof(files_struct) and better layout

[Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>]

David Lang a écrit :
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Andi Kleen a écrit :
> > > Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> writes:
> > > > 1) Reduces the size of (struct fdtable) to exactly 64 bytes on 32bits
> > > > platforms, lowering kmalloc() allocated space by 50%.
> > >
> > > It should be probably a kmem_cache_alloc() instead of a kmalloc
> > > in the first place anyways. This would reduce fragmentation.
> >
> > Well in theory yes, if you really expect thousand of tasks running...
> > But for most machines, number of concurrent tasks is < 200, and using 
> > a special cache for this is not a win.
>
> is it enough of a win on machines with thousands of concurrent tasks 
> that it would be a useful config option?

Well..., not if NR_CPUS is big too. (We just saw a thread on lkml about 
raising NR_CPUS to 1024 on ia64).

On a 1024 CPUS machine, a kmem cache could use at least 1 MB for its internal 
structures, plus 1024 pages (PAGE_SIZE) for holding the caches (one cache per 
CPU), if you assume at least one task was created on behalf each cpu.

if PAGE_SIZE is 64KB, you end up with 65 MB of ram for the cache. Even with 
100.000 tasks running on the machine, its not a win.

slab caches are very complex machinery that consume O(NR_CPUS) ram.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/