OK - sorry, my misparsing of what you asked. I agree that wakeup would
always be caused by some single device, not by multiple devices.
scott
| From [email protected] Thu Jan 5 18:04:42 2006
| Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:02:29 -0800 (PST)
| From: Patrick Mochel<[email protected]>
| cc: Pavel Machek<[email protected]>, Alan Stern<[email protected]>,
|
|
| On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Preece Scott-PREECE wrote:
|
| > This is, of course, in an embedded framework rather than a desktop
| > framework - we suspend and wakeup automatically, not via user
| > intervention. Answering a question asked in another piece of mail, we
| > have roughly a dozen different devices that cause the system to wakeup -
| > keypad press, touchscreen touch, flip open/close, etc.
|
| Hmm, it would be nice if that comment was in reply to the email in which
| it came. At least if it was in the same thread..
|
| Many systems have > 1 _possible_ wakeup devices (keyboard, touchscreen,
| lid, etc). You implied that when a system wakes up, there could be > 1
| device that actually woke the system up, which is in direct conflict with
| what I've always assumed - that when a system wakes up, it is caused by a
| single device (and if there were multiple events, like a key press *and* a
| mouse movement, it's doesn't really matter)..
|
| Thanks,
|
|
| Patrick
|
|
--
scott preece
motorola mobile devices, il67, 1800 s. oak st., champaign, il 61820
e-mail: [email protected] fax: +1-217-384-8550
phone: +1-217-384-8589 cell: +1-217-433-6114 pager: [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
