Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers

On Thursday, January 5, 2006 3:11 pm, Matt Mackall wrote:
> I'm still not sure about in-source annotations for popularity. My
> suspicion is that it's just too workload-dependent, and a given
> author's workload will likely be biased towards their code.

To some extent that's true, but like Linus implied with his "5% work gets 
us 80% there" I think there are a ton of obvious cases, e.g. kmalloc, 
alloc_pages, interrupt handling, etc. that could be marked right away 
and put into a frequently used section.

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.15 ax25 system lockup with kissattach
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]